🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location protests can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "serious and undue restrictions" on civil liberties. Taken together, these progressive assaults on freedom have effectively abolished the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Using Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British Islamic center. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but perverts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at mass killing, you likely can't establish limits at democracy," commented a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racism and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have described as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the actions of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where law enforcement can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from 24 months of ongoing violence that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for holding placards against genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are pensioners; including a retired priest and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and died to secure our liberties. We may eventually regret how casually we allowed them to slip away.